How it goes wrong
The loudest voice wins.
The roadmap is whatever survived the last meeting.
What Weivo does instead
1 Every stakeholder carries an explicit weight.
Influence is set in the open and printed on the report.
Feature prioritization tool with stakeholder voting Every voice weighted. Every decision defensible.
Stakeholders rate what they need. You rate what each feature delivers. Weivo ranks the roadmap and shows whose weight put each item there.
How much each need matters
S Support needs fewer tickets 40%
E Engineering needs less toil 35%
R Revenue needs faster deals 25%
Priority order
1 Self-serve password reset
3 Automated deploy pipeline
2 Salesforce sync
4 Retire legacy billing
The problem
Most prioritization is opinion with a spreadsheet on top.
How it goes wrong
Everyone scores their own feature.
It looks like rigor and convinces nobody.
What Weivo does instead
2 Stakeholders rate needs, never features.
There is no feature on the ballot to push, so scoring your own pet project stops working.
How it goes wrong
The PM guesses what each team wants.
One person's model of the company, stale the day it is written.
What Weivo does instead
3 Stakeholders answer for themselves.
Each one rates the needs from a private link. You rate only what each feature delivers.
Rate the needs. Never the features. That one rule is the whole method.
Every level of detail
The plan for your director. The math for anyone who asks.
Every number comes from the inputs, so the ranking holds up at any depth. Shown on the demo project.
- The plan, at a glance. What made it in, and an AI summary of the trade-offs. Share it as a link or print it.
- Where stakeholders disagree. An alignment flag on every line.
- Why anything ranks where it does. The needs it delivers, whose votes put it there, and its effort.
Weivo is in private beta. Get an email the day it opens to everyone.
From ranking to plan
The ranking is the start. Three outputs turn it into a decision.
Analysis
Every feature ranked by value for effort, with a flag wherever stakeholders disagree and a breakdown of every score.
How the ranking is built →Roadmap scenarios
Set a capacity and see what fits this period, must-haves first, and what is deferred and why. Compare two strategies before you commit.
Roadmap scenarios →Budget allocation
Give the model a total, in hours, in your own currency, or both, and it splits it across programs in proportion to their weighted value.
Budget allocation →Built for
Three teams. One model.
Internal and platform PMs
Every team is your customer, and none of them pays you.
Structure the intake as objectives, let each consuming team rate them with a weight that reflects reality, and fit the quarter to the capacity you have.
Read more →Product PMs
Customers, sales, support and the CEO all have a list.
Turn them into weighted stakeholders, let them rate what the product needs to do, and rank the backlog on what it delivers.
Read more →PMOs and portfolio offices
Split the budget across programs without the annual fight.
Sponsors rate the objectives, programs are rated on what they deliver, and the budget splits itself in proportion to weighted value.
Read more →Your next roadmap review could be the calm one.
Weivo is in private beta with a small group of early users. Join the waitlist and we will email you the day it opens. Your first project is free.